Experiential congruency
The latest experientially congruent construal away from a figure, otherwise a good quantum away from transform, is a condition simplex, as with she didn’t be aware of the guidelines. Whenever we have to congruently build about profile with another quantum off alter, we’ll then add some other condition simplex. Instance, she failed to understand regulations, thus she died, otherwise she died because she failed to understand the regulations. In this situation, i have a sequence off one or two quanta out of change realised congruently in the form of a condition advanced, where in actuality the secondary term rationally enhances the primary clause. As well as such congruent realisations by means of analytical enhancement, we could including encode the same sequence in the way of a natural succession that have a connective, e.g. she did not be aware of the statutes. For that reason, she passed away; or instead a conjunctive, age.grams. she passed away. She failed to understand legislation. Since the each condition in the instances inside part encodes good profile, i claim that they are all experientially congruent realisations of the logico-semantic family relations away from end in.
Thus, within condition height, the newest congruent realisation of your semantic sounding figure is the condition, and therefore of your own semantic group of succession ‘s the clause state-of-the-art or the natural series. We can also discuss about it experiential congruency when explaining connecting singles türkiye the weather within the term transitivity. In the she did not be aware of the regulations, therefore she died, the 2 Members however clause is congruently realised of the nominal organizations (she, the principles), and the Procedure is actually congruently realised of the a spoken group (did not know). Thus, the primary condition as a whole try realized congruently because is a construal of just one shape. A similar goes for the newest secondary clause (she passed away). Both clauses together generate a sequence, that’s congruently realised by the a clause cutting-edge.
That’s, a condition simplex construing an underlying cause–feeling relationships that’s designated by the Processes otherwise a person is actually reduced specific than just a term complex or a natural series you to encodes a similar result in–feeling dating
not, one clause can often condense a few quanta of changes (i.e. occurrences or goings-on). Whenever among the a couple of data, and therefore stands for the reason or even the impact, is realized from the good prepositional phrase helping because the a scenario inside the new clause setting, the fresh clause no longer is considered to be a great congruent experiential realisation. This means that, the fresh new semantic groups are not realised playing with congruent lexicogrammatical info. When you look at the SFL, good prepositional terms functioning because the a scenario when you look at the a condition simplex is termed a small Process. According to Halliday and Matthiessen (1999, 329), this new “prepositional keywords will be interpreted since a good shrunken term, in which the preposition serves as a ‘minor Process’, translated just like the a form of small-verb, in addition to affordable class because the an associate within this slight Processes”, age.g. “the brand new slow down was on account of [we.age. because of] an attack”. The second instances illustrate so it next.
In the 1st of them advice, several rates is actually condensed from inside the a clause simplex (perishing and being ignorant). The second analogy conveys an equivalent data when you look at the a condition advanced, we.elizabeth. a series unlike a single figure. Due to this fact realisational incongruency of term simplex about first example, we are able to claim that it is shorter specific compared to the clause cutting-edge analogy. By exact same token, we are able to declare that the brand new clause simplex is also smaller specific than simply a cohesive succession that have a great conmatical realisation of one’s semantics of your trigger–perception matchmaking (elizabeth.grams. She did not understand regulations. For that reason, she passed away).
Others a few experiential realisations regarding trigger, in the form of a person or perhaps the Processes in itself, can be named instances of squeezed suggestions, again as one or two data are encrypted in a single term. Imagine her ignorance of the legislation caused the lady death, or even the factor in the woman demise is their ignorance of one’s laws and regulations. Predicated on it experiential incongruency, i.e. this new realisation of your own semantic category of succession by means of a term simplex, we could achieve the exact same end regarding your level of explicitness.